Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

What Is Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

Validated Individual Expert

MEV is a crypto term used to describe the deliberate reordering, inclusion, or exclusion of transactions when producing a new block (to be added to a blockchain) in order to extract as much profit as possible. Think of it as the extra value squeezed out of a block beyond the standard reward and gas fees by choosing which transactions to include, and in which order.

MEV has most often been associated with the Ethereum network due to its significant decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. The more complex the transactions involved in a block are — for example, smart contracts connected with lending, borrowing, or trading — the more opportunities there will be for block producers to make extra profit (extract maximum value) by deciding to include, omit, or reorder certain transactions.

Defining Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

When this concept was first introduced, it was mostly associated with the Ethereum network, which used a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism at the time. As such, miners were the ones with the power to reorder, include, or exclude transactions when producing blocks, and could make these choices to squeeze out extra value.

This led to the term Miner Extractable Value being coined to explain the phenomenon of this extraction of as much extra profit as possible. However, in September 2022, Ethereum finalized The Merge, a technical upgrade that switched the network’s consensus mechanism from PoW to proof-of-stake (PoS).

As such, new blocks on the Ethereum network are no longer created by miners but by validators. PoS systems aren’t immune to MEV, however. Blocks are still being created, so whoever chooses which transactions to include, and in what order, can make decisions that will help them to extract as much money from a block as possible. While the old MEV concept still exists, it is now said to stand for Maximal Extractable Value, since it’s no longer exclusive to miners.

How Does It Work?

Understanding how MEV works requires a basic understanding of the role of block producers (be they miners or validators). They play a crucial role in securing and maintaining blockchain networks, and are responsible for verifying transactions and adding them to the network in the form of blocks. Depending on the specific chain, this process is known either as mining or validation.

Simply put, block producers guarantee the integrity of transactions on the network and ensure it continues to function. Without them, no new data can be added to the chain. Block producers are the ones who collect user transaction data and organize them into blocks to be added to the network chain.

The important thing to note is that it’s up to the block producers which transactions to include in their blocks. Logically, transactions are chosen based on profitability, which means those with the highest fees attached to them will be selected first. This is why users pay higher gas fees (or transaction fees) during busy periods — to ensure their transactions are selected first. If a block producer selects the transactions with the highest fees, they will make a bigger profit. Consequently, transactions with lower fees have to wait longer to be included in a block.

However, there is no rule that dictates transactions must be selected or ordered based on fees. When transactions include more complex information (as they do in smart contract-enabled blockchains), block producers can include, exclude, or reorder transactions so as to make extra profit beyond the standard block rewards and fees.

For example, selecting certain transactions over others and ordering them in a particular way may allow for additional profits due to resultant arbitrage opportunities or on-chain liquidation. This is the essence of MEV: the process of selecting and ordering transactions for further financial gain.

MEV searchers

While it seems like MEV is a strategy that solely benefits block producers, a significant amount of MEV is secured by other participants, known as “searchers”. These participants use MEV-specific operations that analyze network data in search of profitable MEV opportunities.

Searchers typically pay extremely high gas fees to block producers to ensure their profitable MEV transactions and strategies are executed. Rationally, depending on the competition for an MEV opportunity, a block producer can receive gas fees of up to 99.99% of a searcher’s potential profit.

Take decentralized exchange (DEX) arbitrage, for example, where searchers have been known to pay more than 90% of their MEV income in gas fees — they do so as it’s the only way to ensure a profitable arbitrage trade is executed ahead of similar trades.

Top Examples of MEV

Arbitrage, front-running, and liquidation all offer opportunities to searchers and block producers seeking to profit through MEV. Below, we take a closer look at these examples to provide a more detailed understanding of what MEV is and how it works.

Arbitrage

When the price of an asset isn’t consistent across exchanges, there is immediately an arbitrage opportunity. In the crypto space, the same token could be priced differently on two different DEXs. When this is spotted by someone (an arbitrageur), they will move to make a trade to profit from the discrepancy. MEV takes place when a searcher’s bot identifies the pending transaction and inserts their own transaction ahead of it in order to extract the value offered by that arbitrage opportunity.

Front-running

Searchers and block producers can take advantage of their ability to order transactions in a block to front-run a significant buy order that’s still pending in the transaction pool. MEV occurs when a similar buy order is inserted ahead of that trade in order to secure a more favorable price before the large buy order goes through, which would increase the price of that digital asset.

A similar MEV strategy is “sandwiching”, which entails placing a buy order before and a sell order after a specific price-moving transaction, thereby taking advantage of the price pressure from both sides.

Liquidations

DeFi allows users to take out loans against deposited digital assets as collateral. If the market moves and the value of the collateral drops below a certain price, that position is liquidated. The smart contracts involved often pay out a reward or fee to the transaction that triggers the liquidation.

An MEV opportunity exists here for any searcher or block producer running bots to spot this kind of transaction, and who are then able to insert their own liquidation transaction in the block ahead of anyone else, thereby extracting the reward value.

Benefits and Drawbacks of MEV

MEV is a rational strategy as those engaging in it are mainly trying to maximize their profits. Some would argue that it benefits the wider ecosystem by ensuring that inefficiencies are corrected as quickly as possible.

For example, MEV searchers racing to be the first to capture value from arbitrage opportunities results in speedy price corrections across DEXs. Similarly, lending protocols don’t want risky loans going unchecked should collateralization levels become unbalanced, so the MEV liquidation push leads to lenders being repaid as soon as possible.

However, MEV also presents a number of issues that mustn’t be ignored. Some implementations, such as front-running and sandwiching, produce bad outcomes for other users, who are forced to overpay on their trades, suffer from greater slippage, or lose out on value in what is essentially a zero-sum game.

Additionally, MEV searcher activity can lead to higher gas prices and network congestion as they compete to insert their transactions into blocks to capture the resulting value.

On a fundamental level, if the value from reordering transactions in a previous block is greater than the rewards and fees of the next block, MEV could make it economically rational for a block producer to commit to blockchain reorganization. This would then threaten the consensus and integrity of the network.

As the ecosystem continues to rapidly evolve, finding solutions to these MEV-related problems is now a core area of research and development within space.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Fed Chair Nominee Waller: Independence Depends on the Fed Itself

    Fed Chair nominee Waller: I will be independent of Trump's opinions. Trump tends to call for the FOMC to cut interest rates. Independence depends on the Fed itself.

  • Digital Bank Revolut's IPO Valuation Could Reach $200 Billion

    The Financial Times reported, citing anonymous investor sources, that the UK digital bank Revolut plans to seek a valuation of $150 billion to $200 billion in its upcoming IPO, a significant increase from its previous valuation of $75 billion. The company's CEO, Nik Storonsky, also revealed that Revolut is preparing for a new round of secondary share sales in the second half of 2026, with a valuation potentially exceeding $100 billion.

  • ETH Falls Below $2300

    Market data shows that ETH has fallen below $2300, currently priced at $2299.92, with a 24-hour decline of 0.38%. The market is experiencing significant fluctuations, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Trump: Disappointed if New Fed Chair Does Not Cut Interest Rates

    On April 21, U.S. President Trump stated: If the new Federal Reserve Chair does not cut interest rates, I will be disappointed.

  • Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Milley States Readiness to Resume Operations

    On April 21, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley stated that the U.S. is ready to resume operations and can act against Iran at any time. (Axios)

  • Bank of Japan to Maintain Interest Rates in April

    On April 21, according to Nikkei News: The Bank of Japan will maintain interest rates unchanged in April.

  • Iranian Military: Ready to Respond Decisively to 'Enemy's Breach of Promises'

    On April 21, local time, Abdollahi, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Command of the Iranian Armed Forces, stated that Iran is prepared to respond decisively to the 'enemy's breach of promises.' Abdollahi emphasized that the current Iranian military possesses 'authority, readiness, and comprehensive strategic capabilities.' He noted that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other defense forces have demonstrated combat capabilities in relevant operations, putting 'Israel and the United States in a difficult and fatigued position,' forcing them to 'seek a ceasefire.' Abdollahi also stressed that the Iranian armed forces maintain a high level of unity with the government and the people under the supreme leader's unified command, and will respond 'decisively, resolutely, and promptly' to any threats and actions. (CCTV News)

  • Another Iranian Oil Tanker Returns to Iran After Breaking US Blockade

    On April 21, according to CCTV News, maritime intelligence company 'TankerTrackers' reported that a tanker belonging to the National Iranian Tanker Company returned to Iran after unloading approximately 2 million barrels of crude oil in Indonesia, crossing the relevant maritime blockade line. The tanker is currently en route to Iran's main oil export hub, Khark Island, and is expected to arrive on April 22 local time. It is reported that the tanker set sail from Iran in late March, heading towards the Riau Islands of Indonesia.

  • White House: US and Iran on the Verge of Reaching an Agreement

    On April 21, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany stated in an interview with Fox News on the evening of the 20th that the United States and Iran are on the "verge of reaching an agreement." McEnany remarked, "The US has never been closer to achieving a truly good deal." However, she did not disclose any information regarding the current status of the negotiations. McEnany noted that even if an agreement is not reached, President Trump has multiple options and is not afraid to utilize these measures. Previous actions have demonstrated that Trump is not just "bluffing."

  • Kelp DAO Attacker Transfers 30,800 ETH to Special Address

    On April 21, news emerged that, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the Kelp DAO attacker transferred 30,800 ETH to a special address starting with 0x00000, possibly indicating a destruction action.