Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

OpenSea Addresses Scammers With New Collection Settings, but They Create New Issues for NFT Teams

So, I ran into a new and exciting issue on OpenSea yesterday as I was doing some setup for a new ETH smart contract — claiming and setting up the collection on OpenSea.

As most people who’ve been in the space for a while already know, scammers are everywhere in web3. And since there’s so much $$$ in the NFT space, scammers have complicated matters for marketplaces and for NFT teams alike.

Here’s an example of the problem I’ll address here: You’re doing an NFT drop in the next 6 months. It’s going to be called “Nuclear Cat Squad.” (I just made that up. Hopefully there isn’t an actual “Nuclear Cat Squad” already.)

Anyway, so you start doing your various hyping on Twitter and elsewhere, pasting sample NFTs, building up your audience, etc.

At first no one cares because it’s tough to get noticed. But after months of work, you’ve got yourself 10,000 Twitter followers and word is spreading. All is going well.

And then… someone on your Discord says, “Hey, what’s this?” And they link to a collection on OpenSea. Some scammer has collected every single preview image you’ve posted, created an OpenSea account / collection, and has of course taken the name “Nuclear Cat Squad” as well as the URL “nuclearcatsquad” (which is what OpenSea uses for the URL of your collection).

The above scenario has happened about 8 million times to people. It’s actually something that, very early on, we all expected to happen. And so we came up with this process:

Our Previous Solution

To avoid this, we would always advise our clients to grab a temp wallet, go to OpenSea, and setup a whole bunch of collections. We would have them setup “Nuclear Cat Squad” as well as “Nuclear Cats” and “Nuclear Cat Squad NFT” and various other similar names (and also similar URLs). To some extent, this seemed to have deterred scammers, although you can never get ALL of the names you want, and scammers will find a way.

Anyway, when it came time to launch, we would deploy the contract, mint an NFT, and then head over to OpenSea to setup the actual collection. We would have the client login to OpenSea at the same time, and we would have them change “Nuclear Cat Squad” (and the “nuclearcatsquad” URL) to something else (like “Nuclear Cat Squad Old” and “nuclearcatsquadold”). This would free up the names for us to use, using their deployer wallet. And thus, we’d get the actual, desired name and url for the collection.

We’ve actually got a handful of clients with forthcoming collections who’ve done the above already.

OpenSea’s New Code

Yesterday, though, I noticed that the above approach no longer works. When I had the client go in and change his “Nuclear Cat Squad” and “nuclearcatsquad” to something else, it didn’t let me take the name (even if it DID indicate that the name was free). Instead, it alerted me that the name was “too similar” to something else that existed already.

It suggested I reach out to support if there is something wrong. (So, I did that. Will update with their resoponse.)

What’s Wrong Here…

So, I suspect this is one of those good/bad moves that coders can make sometimes. You implement a fix, but the fix creates new problems!

It’s a good thing for existing collections, of course. If someone tries to start a new “Bored Ape Yacht Club,” it’s going to know (rightly so) that this is probably a scam.

But OpenSea’s solutions creates a big problem for unlaunched collections: If NFT teams can no longer create temp / placeholder collections to reserve the official names, then it’s almost 100% certain that scammers will be grabbing/using those names/urls before any collection launches. That’s what they’ve always done, and that’s what they’ll certainly continue to do.

Thus, launching a collection will ALWAYS be a problem from here on out on OpenSea. Anytime you launch, you’re going to clash with whatever scam set has grabbed the name and URL you’d wanted. And so you’re going to have to contact support and hopefully work it out. But that’s going to take time, which is not always in high supply during an NFT launch.

What Does OpenSea Recommend?

I’m awaiting a response to a support ticket on that, in which I’ve asked this question. Will update with their recommendation, if they respond.

NFT
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC breaks through $69,000

     the market shows BTC breaking through $69,000, currently at $69,021.49, with a 24-hour increase of 1.15%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • Spanish Foreign Minister: Not worried about any consequences of refusing US access to military bases

     on March 3 local time, Spanish Foreign Minister Alvarez defended the Spanish government's refusal to provide the Rota and Moron military bases to the United States for participation in attacks on Iran. Alvarez stated that the operation initiated by the United States and Israel is not supported by the United Nations and is not part of the bilateral agreements allowing the use of the aforementioned Spanish sovereign military bases. Alvarez also said that the Spanish government is not concerned that this stance will have any consequences. Alvarez stated: "The position of the Spanish government represents the will of the vast majority of the Spanish people as well as the vast majority of people worldwide, which is to defend the UN Charter, respect international law, and believe that cooperation is always more powerful than confrontation."

  • Spot gold plunges nearly $100 in the short term.

     spot gold plunged nearly 100 dollars in a short time, spot gold fell below 5170 dollars/ounce, with a daily decline of 2.94%. 

  • BTC falls below $67,000

    the market shows BTC fell below $67,000, currently at $66,996.93, with a 24-hour increase of 1.18%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • ETH breaks $2,000

    the market shows ETH breaking through $2000, currently at $2001.64, with a 24-hour increase of 2.89%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • The US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net inflow of $962.48 million yesterday.

    according to Trader T's monitoring, the US spot Bitcoin ETF had a net inflow of 962.48 million USD yesterday.

  • BTC falls below $66,000

     the market shows BTC fell below 66,000 USD, currently at 65,986.66 USD, with a 24-hour decline of 1.31%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • BTC falls below $66,000

     the market shows BTC fell below $66,000, currently at $65,973.16, a 24-hour drop of 2.66%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • ETH breaks $2,000

    market shows ETH breaking through $2000, currently at $2000.29, with a 24-hour increase of 3.73%. The market is volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • The United States uses Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology in its airstrikes in the Middle East.

     United States used Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology in airstrikes in the Middle East, and just hours before the attack, Trump had just issued a ban against Anthropic.