Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How to Stay Safe in DeFi: A Simple Guide to Evaluate Project Safety

The collapse of FTX proved the importance of self-custody and risk management.

But it’s so easy to lose money in DeFi if you are not careful with many exploits, rug pulls, contract bugs around.

In this blog I’d like to share how to evaluate safety of DeFi protocols to protect your assets.

It’s great if you’re an experienced smart contract developer and can verify the code yourself. But most of us aren’t.

It leaves us with no other choice, but to evaluate projects based on other data, that involves some degree of trust.

Total Value Lock, ultimate proof of security?

It’s no secret that the majority evaluate DeFi projects by how much value is deposited to the smart contracts. So, TVL is the ultimate proof of trust.

The higher the Total Value Locked, the higher the implied security of a protocol. If a lot of money is deposited, it means ‘someone’ did due diligence, and that protocol is secure.

Unfortunately, it gives a false sense of security. And high TVL protocols are actively targeted by hackers. At the same time, low TVL doesn’t mean a protocol is not secure.

Take a look at the top DeFi protocols by TVL.

  • Do you think that the TVL represents the level of security/safety?
  • Is there any protocol you wouldn’t trust with your money? Why?

There might be biases in you based on what you read online.

Trust, but verify?

‘Don’t trust, verify’ is the reason we have smart contract audits.

If that wasn’t the case, we might not need audits, because code is open source and community could find all the issues in the code. Yet the community might not have the right motivation, incentives or expertise to verify code.

Auditors are supposed to have the right technical expertise, but at the end of the day, we also have to trust them to do the right job.

Remember Twitter backlash against Certik because a few of their audited protocols ended up hacked?

Audit companies are building their reputation too. If the protocols they audit (and evaluated as safe) are exploited, then it shows lack of expertise. In fact, Certik has audited 3,422 projects, so no wonder some of them got hacked or had a bug.

Just having an audit doesn’t mean the protocol is safe. I’ve seen projects proudly announcing ‘Completed audit’, but when you read the audit the safety score is actually low.

The lesson is not to trust the announcements blindly, but verify the result by reading the actual audit.

What if you don’t read the audits?

The majority doesn’t read the audits anyway.

Knowing that Certik has a dashboard with all their audited projects. You can check the ‘Trust Score’ with higher number implying safety.

https://www.certik.com/

Other auditors like Hacken has a similar dashboard, or you could simply read the audit summary. Check the example, of Trader Joe’s audit done by Paladin.

You can see here that Trader Joe fixed high and medium severity issues, but not all low severity issues has been resolved.

https://paladinsec.co/projects/trader-joe-launchpeg/

Audit is just a start.

A lot more is needed to evaluate safety:

  • Adequate testing
  • Bounty campaigns
  • Documentation clarity
  • Admin controls
  • Oracle documentation

and much more… It’s a nightmare to verify it all yourself.

I really like what DefiSafety is doing. Its Process Quality Review verifies protocols and gives them a safety score.

https://www.defisafety.com/app?orderBy=finalScore

According to the PQR results, Liquity Protocol, Synthetix and Angle Protocol are the safest of all verified DeFi protocols.

On DefiSafety you can then check every element and see where the protocol scores the best/worst.

For example, Liquidy still needs Formal Verification.

Additionally, you can start by rating your portfolio safety on Exponential DeFi.

Its ‘Rate my wallet’ feature provides you with a custom risk analysis of your current investments. For example, $4.5M of Tetranode’s assets are deposited into riskier (C rank) protocols.

Elemental DeFi gives a score based on the project evaluation.Assessment takes into account asset risk, code quality and blockchain security to which the assets are deposited.

I like their easy to understand explanation of risks.

For example, take a look at Abracadabra’s MIM. It warns of SPELL being used as collateral which could result in bad debt.

If in doubt, ask!

Finally, I recommend joining the project community groups and ask:

Do they have an insurance fund?

Do they avoid questions?

What are they doing to increase security?

I asked Stargate team if they had an insurance fund in case they get hacked, but it sometimes more difficult to get an answer than I thought, which poses red flags.

But whatever happens, DeFi is still young, so better not to put all your assets into one protocol.

Do you have more useful tips how to evaluate projects and protect your assets?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • BTC breaks through $69,000

     the market shows BTC breaking through $69,000, currently at $69,021.49, with a 24-hour increase of 1.15%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • Spanish Foreign Minister: Not worried about any consequences of refusing US access to military bases

     on March 3 local time, Spanish Foreign Minister Alvarez defended the Spanish government's refusal to provide the Rota and Moron military bases to the United States for participation in attacks on Iran. Alvarez stated that the operation initiated by the United States and Israel is not supported by the United Nations and is not part of the bilateral agreements allowing the use of the aforementioned Spanish sovereign military bases. Alvarez also said that the Spanish government is not concerned that this stance will have any consequences. Alvarez stated: "The position of the Spanish government represents the will of the vast majority of the Spanish people as well as the vast majority of people worldwide, which is to defend the UN Charter, respect international law, and believe that cooperation is always more powerful than confrontation."

  • Spot gold plunges nearly $100 in the short term.

     spot gold plunged nearly 100 dollars in a short time, spot gold fell below 5170 dollars/ounce, with a daily decline of 2.94%. 

  • BTC falls below $67,000

    the market shows BTC fell below $67,000, currently at $66,996.93, with a 24-hour increase of 1.18%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • ETH breaks $2,000

    the market shows ETH breaking through $2000, currently at $2001.64, with a 24-hour increase of 2.89%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • The US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net inflow of $962.48 million yesterday.

    according to Trader T's monitoring, the US spot Bitcoin ETF had a net inflow of 962.48 million USD yesterday.

  • BTC falls below $66,000

     the market shows BTC fell below 66,000 USD, currently at 65,986.66 USD, with a 24-hour decline of 1.31%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • BTC falls below $66,000

     the market shows BTC fell below $66,000, currently at $65,973.16, a 24-hour drop of 2.66%. The market is highly volatile, please manage your risks accordingly.

  • ETH breaks $2,000

    market shows ETH breaking through $2000, currently at $2000.29, with a 24-hour increase of 3.73%. The market is volatile, please manage your risk accordingly.

  • The United States uses Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology in its airstrikes in the Middle East.

     United States used Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology in airstrikes in the Middle East, and just hours before the attack, Trump had just issued a ban against Anthropic.