Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How to Stay Safe in DeFi: A Simple Guide to Evaluate Project Safety

The collapse of FTX proved the importance of self-custody and risk management.

But it’s so easy to lose money in DeFi if you are not careful with many exploits, rug pulls, contract bugs around.

In this blog I’d like to share how to evaluate safety of DeFi protocols to protect your assets.

It’s great if you’re an experienced smart contract developer and can verify the code yourself. But most of us aren’t.

It leaves us with no other choice, but to evaluate projects based on other data, that involves some degree of trust.

Total Value Lock, ultimate proof of security?

It’s no secret that the majority evaluate DeFi projects by how much value is deposited to the smart contracts. So, TVL is the ultimate proof of trust.

The higher the Total Value Locked, the higher the implied security of a protocol. If a lot of money is deposited, it means ‘someone’ did due diligence, and that protocol is secure.

Unfortunately, it gives a false sense of security. And high TVL protocols are actively targeted by hackers. At the same time, low TVL doesn’t mean a protocol is not secure.

Take a look at the top DeFi protocols by TVL.

  • Do you think that the TVL represents the level of security/safety?
  • Is there any protocol you wouldn’t trust with your money? Why?

There might be biases in you based on what you read online.

Trust, but verify?

‘Don’t trust, verify’ is the reason we have smart contract audits.

If that wasn’t the case, we might not need audits, because code is open source and community could find all the issues in the code. Yet the community might not have the right motivation, incentives or expertise to verify code.

Auditors are supposed to have the right technical expertise, but at the end of the day, we also have to trust them to do the right job.

Remember Twitter backlash against Certik because a few of their audited protocols ended up hacked?

Audit companies are building their reputation too. If the protocols they audit (and evaluated as safe) are exploited, then it shows lack of expertise. In fact, Certik has audited 3,422 projects, so no wonder some of them got hacked or had a bug.

Just having an audit doesn’t mean the protocol is safe. I’ve seen projects proudly announcing ‘Completed audit’, but when you read the audit the safety score is actually low.

The lesson is not to trust the announcements blindly, but verify the result by reading the actual audit.

What if you don’t read the audits?

The majority doesn’t read the audits anyway.

Knowing that Certik has a dashboard with all their audited projects. You can check the ‘Trust Score’ with higher number implying safety.

https://www.certik.com/

Other auditors like Hacken has a similar dashboard, or you could simply read the audit summary. Check the example, of Trader Joe’s audit done by Paladin.

You can see here that Trader Joe fixed high and medium severity issues, but not all low severity issues has been resolved.

https://paladinsec.co/projects/trader-joe-launchpeg/

Audit is just a start.

A lot more is needed to evaluate safety:

  • Adequate testing
  • Bounty campaigns
  • Documentation clarity
  • Admin controls
  • Oracle documentation

and much more… It’s a nightmare to verify it all yourself.

I really like what DefiSafety is doing. Its Process Quality Review verifies protocols and gives them a safety score.

https://www.defisafety.com/app?orderBy=finalScore

According to the PQR results, Liquity Protocol, Synthetix and Angle Protocol are the safest of all verified DeFi protocols.

On DefiSafety you can then check every element and see where the protocol scores the best/worst.

For example, Liquidy still needs Formal Verification.

Additionally, you can start by rating your portfolio safety on Exponential DeFi.

Its ‘Rate my wallet’ feature provides you with a custom risk analysis of your current investments. For example, $4.5M of Tetranode’s assets are deposited into riskier (C rank) protocols.

Elemental DeFi gives a score based on the project evaluation.Assessment takes into account asset risk, code quality and blockchain security to which the assets are deposited.

I like their easy to understand explanation of risks.

For example, take a look at Abracadabra’s MIM. It warns of SPELL being used as collateral which could result in bad debt.

If in doubt, ask!

Finally, I recommend joining the project community groups and ask:

Do they have an insurance fund?

Do they avoid questions?

What are they doing to increase security?

I asked Stargate team if they had an insurance fund in case they get hacked, but it sometimes more difficult to get an answer than I thought, which poses red flags.

But whatever happens, DeFi is still young, so better not to put all your assets into one protocol.

Do you have more useful tips how to evaluate projects and protect your assets?

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Anthropic's Secondary Market Valuation Reaches $1 Trillion, Surpassing OpenAI

    On April 23, Anthropic's valuation on private equity trading platforms like Forge Global has risen to around $1 trillion, surpassing OpenAI's $880 billion. It is reported that the valuation of this artificial intelligence startup has rapidly increased due to buyers competing to purchase the increasingly scarce secondary market shares of Anthropic. (Dongxin News Agency)

  • BTC Surpasses $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has surpassed $78,000, currently priced at $78,000.81, with a 24-hour decline of 0.14%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • Bitmine Allegedly Acquires 100,000 ETH Worth $233.7 Million

    On April 23, according to monitoring by Lookonchain, three new addresses suspected to be associated with Tom Lee's Bitmine (0xB6a8...9c9E, 0xc2e0...2831, 0x4e5C...276c) received 100,000 ETH from BitGo, valued at $233.7 million.

  • Musk: AI Chip Shortage Expected in the Future

    On April 23, Tesla CEO Elon Musk stated during an earnings call that the company initiated the Terafab chip factory project due to an anticipated severe shortage of AI chips in the future. He remarked, "In terms of industry growth rates, logic chips, and even more so storage chips, we expect to encounter bottlenecks if we do not manufacture chips ourselves. This is the reason for the birth of Terafab." (Dongxin News Agency)

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Inflow of $331.9 Million Yesterday

    On April 23, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net inflow of $331.9 million yesterday.

  • US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees Net Inflow of $96.43 Million Yesterday

    On April 23, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Ethereum ETF saw a net inflow of $96.43 million yesterday.

  • U.S. State Department Urges American Citizens to Leave Iran Immediately

    On April 23, the Bureau of Consular Affairs of the U.S. State Department posted on social media that, given Iran's announcement of partial airspace reopening, American citizens in Iran should leave immediately. The post advised U.S. citizens to stay informed about the situation through local media and to consult commercial airlines for information on flights departing Iran. Additionally, U.S. citizens can also travel by land to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Turkmenistan, but should avoid areas along the Iran-Afghanistan, Iran-Iraq, or Iran-Pakistan borders.

  • Tesla: Increasing Investment in AI Computing Power and Advancing New Battery and Material Factories

    On April 23, Tesla's official blog announced that the company is increasing its investment in AI computing power to advance the construction of new battery and battery materials factories. This move is also aimed at further preparing for the production of the third-generation Megapack energy storage system, the Tesla autonomous electric vehicle Cybercab, and the Tesla electric truck Semi.

  • USA: Deploying the Strongest Military Force in History to the Middle East

    On April 23, local time April 22, the U.S. Central Command announced that since the U.S. military began its blockade operations in the waters related to the Strait of Hormuz on April 14, it has requested 31 vessels to turn around or return to port as part of the blockade. The U.S. Central Command also stated that the military is currently deploying the most comprehensive and powerful military force ever seen across the Middle East.

  • Iran Does Not Officially Respond to Extended Ceasefire Deadline

    On April 23, Iran has not provided any official response regarding U.S. President Trump's announcement to extend the temporary ceasefire deadline, nor about the possibility of a second round of negotiations with the U.S. Iranian public opinion widely believes that the contradictions in U.S. rhetoric and its constantly changing policies are the main reasons for Iran's inability to trust the U.S. Additionally, Israel's repeated violations of the Lebanon-Israel ceasefire agreement and the ongoing U.S. maritime blockade against Iran are key factors affecting the negotiation process. Analysts point out that the risk of renewed war and conflict remains very high, and if both sides continue to insist on their current demands and conditions, the nature of this regional crisis may evolve from a purely U.S.-Iran issue into a global problem.