Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

How Bitcoin Could Have Prevented Silicon Valley Bank from Collapsing?

Validated Project

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was recently considered the go-to bank for venture capital and tech startups…

It has over $342 billion in client assets and was called the “startups bank.”

However, in just 36 hours, it all came crashing down…

Thousands of companies are now on the edge, and the damage to the economy is yet to be seen. Here’s everything you need to know about SVB’s downfall + how Bitcoin could have prevented this:

What happened to SVB?

Silicon Valley Bank, is a bank that specializes in serving the technology and venture capital industries (in particular US-based start-ups).

They made concentrated bets and invested heavily in safe assets like US Treasuries. This strategy worked well in a low-interest rate regime…

However, when the Fed started hiking rates last year, SVB made a risky bet that the Fed’s pace would be slower. They invested $100 billion into government-backed bonds and locked it away for 3–4 years at an interest rate of 1.79%

But, the FED started hiking rates fast, which made SBV’s bonds be worth significantly less than initally purchased…

Remember: Silicon Valley Bank used its client’s money to make these risky bets!

Ultimately SVB had to sell at a loss for liquidity. This loss became significant when SVB’s clients, mostly startups, started withdrawing more money to pay for expenses…

SVB needed money to fund withdrawals but had to take a loss on bonds to do this. On March 8, the company announced they would sell a third of ownership to raise $2.25 billion. But the next day, the stock dropped by 60% when word got out that the bank was facing insolvency issues. The CEO called clients to assure them their money was safe… hmmm

The problem with FDIC insurance

FDIC insurance is a type of deposit insurance offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to protect depositors in case their bank fails or becomes insolvent.

Although the FDIC insurance covers accounts up to $250k, 97.3% of accounts at SVB were larger than that, as they were business accounts

Though the companies might get some of their money back when assets are sold, it might take years.

That’s an emergency because that money is needed for payroll, expenses, and just keeping companies running. Companies that saved up cash to prepare for a recession could now just die because they couldn’t access their money!

How could Bitcoin have prevented this?

Bitcoin operates differently from banks.

It’s decentralized, meaning it doesn’t rely on a central authority to operate. Instead, it uses a public ledger, known as the blockchain, to keep track of transactions. This makes it more transparent and secure than traditional banking systems.

Bitcoin doesn’t operate on a fractional reserve system, meaning there’s no risk of banks taking bets on what the Fed will do…

Additionally, Bitcoin is a finite currency, meaning there’s a limit to the number of Bitcoins that can be created. This makes it less susceptible to inflation and devaluation (unlike all fiat currencies which are becoming worthless due to skyhigh inflation)

Moreover, with Bitcoin, there’s no need to worry about FDIC insurance because it’s not a centralized authority. Instead, your funds are stored in a digital wallet, which only you have access to. This gives you complete control over your funds and eliminates the risk of banks failing or insolvency issues.

SVB’s failure is a significant blow to the tech world, and thousands of companies are now on the edge.

The problem with fractional reserve banking systems and FDIC insurance has been exposed, and it’s time to rethink our banking systems.

Bitcoin, with its decentralized nature and finite currency, could be the solution we need to prevent another SVB-like disaster!

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. July Nonfarm Payrolls Fall by 23,000, Missing Market Expectations

    On August 7, U.S. nonfarm payrolls decreased by 23,000 in July, compared with market expectations of an increase of 80,000, and the previous value was an increase of 57,000.

  • US May and June Nonfarm Payroll Additions Revised Down by 103,000 Combined

    On August 7, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: May nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 129,000 to 63,000; June nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 57,000 to 20,000. After the revisions, the combined additions for May and June were 103,000 lower than previously reported.

  • U.S. Rate Futures Market Sees Lower Odds of Fed September Hike

    On August 7, the probability of a Fed rate hike in September as priced by U.S. interest rate futures declined.

  • New York Gold Futures Top $4,400 per Ounce

    New York gold futures topped $4,400 per ounce, up 2.36% on the day.

  • Japan Finance Minister: FX Market Affected by Moves Not Driven by Actual Demand

    Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said she and U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent agreed that the foreign exchange market has been affected by moves not driven by actual demand.

  • BTC Breaks Through $65,000

    Market data shows BTC has broken through $65,000, currently reported at $65,007.44, with a 24-hour increase of 0.6%. The market is highly volatile, please exercise risk control.

  • Brent Crude Drops 2.00% Intraday to $81.07/Barrel

    Brent crude oil fell 2.00% during the day, now at $81.07 per barrel. (Jin Shi)

  • Trump: Data Centers May Be More Important Than Oil

    August 7 news, U.S. President Trump said in an interview with Punchbowl News, "I saw the other day that Texas seems to be opposed to building data centers. I think that's a mistake. I'm not taking a position—I just think it's a mistake, because there are other communities that want to build data centers. When a community is willing to accept data centers, it means a lot of money will flow into that community. I don't think they're ugly. Some of the data centers I've seen are the most incredible buildings I've ever seen. They are very important to the economy. If Texas says no to data centers, that's a mistake, because data centers may be more important than oil."

  • Trump to Meet with Mining Executives

    On August 7, according to CCTV International News, US President Trump will convene executives from some of the world's largest mining companies at the US State Department on August 7 local time, in an effort to take action to 'secure critical mineral supplies for the US and its allies.' Reuters reported that the US urgently needs critical minerals to replenish weapons inventories depleted during the war against Iran. During the more than five-month war with Iran, the US military expended large quantities of precision-guided missiles and air defense interceptors. US defense officials and lawmakers have warned that given existing production capacity constraints, replenishing some stockpiles could take years—although the Trump administration has denied reports of a so-called 'severe shortage of ammunition stockpiles.' According to Pentagon officials and defense companies, supplies of minerals such as rare earths, tungsten, germanium, and scandium are essential for manufacturing precision-guided missiles, fighter jets, armored vehicles, infrared sensors, and other advanced weapons systems. Expected attendees include industry giants such as global mining giant Rio Tinto Group, Australia's BHP, US Freeport-McMoRan, US Mountain Pass Materials, US Rare Earths, US Energy Fuels, and Canada's Metals Company. According to sources, the Trump administration plans to announce multiple deals and memorandums of understanding.

  • US Regulators Systematically Review Chinese AI Firms' Third-Country Computing Power Leasing

    August 7 news, according to Bloomberg, people familiar with the matter revealed that the U.S. government department responsible for investigating chip export control violations is reviewing Chinese AI companies' leasing of computing power in third countries to obtain Nvidia advanced chips.