Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

After FTX: Does Solana Belong in the Top 20 Cryptos by Market Capitalization?

Validated Individual Expert

We've witnessed some intense falls from grace in 2022- Kanye West, Kyrie Irving, Mark Zuckerberg, Alex Mashinsky, Do Kwon, every long crypto investor, and Sam Bankman-Fried are some of the top people that come to mind. However, in terms of once-promising crypto projects, I'd argue that Solana has fallen the furthest. A year ago, Solana seemed unstoppable. Today, it's hard to determine where the bottom will come.

In this piece, I'd like to examine whether Solana is investable in its current state and why I don't think it deserves a place in the top 20 cryptos by market capitalization.

I will confess that I panic-sold a small bag of SOL at around $14 and hold more Solana NFTs than I'm comfortable with now. I also got my ass handed to me for an investment in FCNs on Cega I made a couple of months ago.

So clearly, I'm biased and licking my wounds. But, as much as I want to believe in Solana's long-term value and prospects, I think it has become damaged merchandise. So allow me to share three reasons Solana is dangerous in the short term and why I won't buy more unless the price drops another 50–75%.

What is so great about Solana?

Before dissecting why Solana is a poisoned project, I want to share what makes it such a great project. First, its quick ascendence in the most recent bull run isn't reliant on hype or speculation.

Solana is extremely fast and cheap to use. A Solana transaction is a fraction of a penny when a transaction on Ethereum costs significantly more. Other competing Layer 1s like BSC, Fantom, Polygon, and Avalanche also sport higher gas fees than Solana. And a Solana transaction is faster than these competitors.

Because of its low transaction costs and high speeds, Solana serves as an excellent chain for NFTs and gaming projects. In addition, Solana's premier NFT marketplace, Magiceden.io, has sported over 134 million transactions, an incredible accomplishment.

Further, Solana has 88 DeFi protocols. This is impressive as they couldn't fork projects directly from Ethereum projects. Moreover, some of the most robust and hyped games, such as StepN, MonkeyBall, Illuvium, and Aurory, are on Solana.

Lastly, Solana has one of the best hot wallets, Phantom. The Phantom wallet is easy to use, has a robust mobile app, and is exceptionally intuitive. I'd describe Phantom wallet as an Apple-like product, whereas Metamask is a PC product.

Solana is a refreshing experience after dealing with the clunkiness, slowness, and expense involved with Ethereum and other EVM-compatible chains.

Why has Solana fallen so far, so fast?

Solana has been primarily financially backed by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and Alameda Research. Dumping vast sums of money into an ecosystem as Alameda did will help a crypto ecosystem proliferate and attract skilled developers.

It's no secret that FTX and Alameda Research held significant value in Solana's native token, SOL. Additionally, both entities also contained a large amount of Solana-based DeFi project tokens. With the speedy collapse of SBF's vast empire, the painful drop in Solana's price has caused an adverse chain reaction throughout the ecosystem.

Many investors and traders are taking the same route I did and selling now while the fire is still burning. Fears of staked token unlock, potential dumps and liquidations, and the recent memory of the Luna debacle drive significant volatility in Solana's price.

Since the FTX fiasco, the value of Solana had dropped to under $15 when it was trading in a $30-$40 range for nearly six months prior.

Solana is ranked #15 on CoinGecko. Here's why I see this ranking dropping further.

After taking such a shellacking, many investors may think the worst is over for Solana. However, I would argue the pain for Solana is probably just beginning. The three main reasons I see additional near-term pain for Solana are its tarnished image, massive devaluation, and loss of funding.

Birds of a feather flock together.

The crypto community is pretty pissed at Sam Bankman-Fried. Whether you had money or crypto in FTX, FTX.us, BlockFi, or any other FTX-affiliated exchange/lender or had funds in the crypto market, this cataclysmic fraud is a blow to the entire space. $200 billion in market value evaporated in a week.

Solana has been synonymous with SBF. Of course, the chain already had some black marks with multiple outages, but why would you want to speculate in a wasteland associated with this character?

Meanwhile, you have other chains like Polygon making positive announcements consecutively. Or, you can invest in BSC, backed by (currently) the most legitimate centralized exchange. Finally, Ethereum Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum and Optimism are growing massively.

Massive Devaluation

Investors who thought they owned a wrapped version of Bitcoin and Ethereum on Solana are learning that their wrapped tokens are wrapped pieces of garbage, trading for a fraction of their supposed peg value. This is because FTX was backing the Sollet-wrapped versions of these coins.

I have some USDC that I may get off Cega (not sure if it will ever be released). However, I am unclear whether the USDC will retain its peg if/when I can pull it off the platform.

Solana-based DeFi tokens' markdowns have been equally harsh as the SOL token. For example, look at the amount of value locked in Solana DeFi in the past week.

Graph from Solscan.io

It gets even worse if you look at the valuation of the entire DeFi ecosystem on Solana.

Graph from defillama.com

Once sporting nearly $10 billion in total value locked, Solana DeFi currently has a total of $327 million. This ranks lower than chains like Mixin and DeFi Chain. Additionally, Solana has less TVL than Fantom and is valued ten times higher than Fantom.

Perhaps the most painful devaluation is in NFTs. Since Solana NFTs get priced in SOL, their values are cratering. For example, a 5 SOL NFT was valued at around $150USD one week ago, and today a 5 SOL NFT is worth less than $75USD. Why would anyone want to buy NFTs on an unstable chain when you can buy them on Polygon, Ethereum, or other more stable chains?

Loss of Funding

Some projects on Solana held their treasuries in FTX. Those treasuries are now gone. They got rugged, just like us retail traders who had funds on the platforms. Loss of treasuries results in less money to improve and build projects.

What if you are looking for funding for an existing or new project? Now that Alameda Research is gone, where do you try to raise funds? I can't see VCs looking to jump into Solana-based projects for the reasons I am outlining here.

Why I may be wrong

I've gotten a lot of things wrong in crypto. I'm not trying to say that Solana is a doomed project that will go the way of EOS or other forgotten crypto projects.

But, when measuring the risks of holding SOL compared to the possible gains, I can think of at least 20 other cryptos where I would instead park my funds.

That said, some other entities could fill the SBF/Alameda void. For example, Solana has a lot of users and a lot of wallets. Many of these users have probably interacted with Ethereum and EVM-compatible chains, so they likely understand the speed and ease of using Solana.

We haven't heard of any projects abandoning Solana, so that is a good sign. And, while Solana's price has cascaded, it has found a bit of stability in the $13/$14 range.

Solana could be an excellent bounce-back candidate if the crypto market sees a short-term recovery.

Key Takeaways

I may be throwing the baby out with the bathwater on this one. But if the crypto market continues its bearish tendencies, I have a hard time believing Solana won't see additional drawdowns.

The narrative behind Solana is so awful right now, and investors who haven't been entirely rekt are nursing their wounds. Solana doesn't deserve a place in the top 20 and needs to find some wins before I can look in its direction again. I may be in the minority, and I'm okay if I'm wrong. Many other cryptos will also go up in a world where Solana goes up.

What do you think? Am I overreacting because I lost money? Is Solana undervalued for its technology? Am I missing something obvious? Do you believe Solana will climb back to its $100+ billion valuation? Let me and other readers know your opinion in the responses.

This article isn't financial advice, and I am not a financial advisor. It is strictly my opinion. I am someone who wants to maintain and grow my wealth so that I can provide a good livelihood for my family and myself. So do your research before making any investments.

FTX
Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • DeepSeek-V4 Preview Version Officially Launched and Open-Sourced

    On April 24, DeepSeek announced via its official WeChat account that the preview version of the new model series DeepSeek-V4 is officially online and open-sourced. DeepSeek-V4 features a million-word ultra-long context and leads in agent capabilities, world knowledge, and reasoning performance in both domestic and open-source fields. The model is available in two versions based on size. Starting today, users can log in to the official website chat.deepseek.com or the official app to interact with the latest DeepSeek-V4 and explore the new experience of 1M ultra-long context memory. The API service has also been updated; by changing the model_name to deepseek-v4-pro or deepseek-v4-flash, users can access it.

  • Intel CEO: Semiconductor Potential Market Size Approaching $1 Trillion

    On April 24, local time, after the U.S. stock market closed on April 23, Intel officially released its Q1 fiscal year 2026 financial report and held an earnings call. The company delivered its sixth consecutive quarter of better-than-expected results, with revenue, gross margin, and earnings per share all surpassing guidance. The AI business has become the core growth engine, with a surge in demand for server CPUs and advancements in advanced processes and packaging exceeding expectations. Following this financial report, Intel's stock price surged nearly 20% in after-hours trading. During the earnings call, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger stated that despite continuous improvements in factory capacity, demand across all business segments remains higher than supply, particularly for Xeon server CPUs, which are expected to maintain strong growth momentum over the next two years. Gelsinger also noted, 'In recent years, the focus in high-performance computing has been almost entirely on graphics processors and other accelerators. In recent months, clear signs have shown that central processing units are becoming an indispensable foundation in the era of artificial intelligence.' Looking at the overall market, Gelsinger anticipates that driven by explosive growth in AI demand, the overall potential market size of the semiconductor industry is approaching $1 trillion. However, Intel's management also warned that the company still faces multiple pressures, including declining demand in the PC market, rising costs, expanding capital expenditures, and supply constraints. (Dongxin News Agency)

  • Trump: U.S. to Soon Capture Nearly 50% of Chip Market

    On April 24, U.S. President Trump declared on the 23rd that the United States will soon capture nearly 50% of the chip market, warning that chip companies that do not manufacture in the U.S. will face very high tariffs in a year and a half to two years. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo stated that the U.S. previously held only 3% to 4% of the chip market while having the largest demand for chips. Under Trump's directive, the U.S. is requiring semiconductor fabs to return to domestic production, with expectations that fabs worth $1 trillion will come to the U.S. Raimondo emphasized that this is not about tech giants purchasing chips, but rather about chip manufacturing. She mentioned commitments from Micron Technology to invest $200 billion and TSMC to invest $165 billion, along with $500 billion in funds from Taiwan expected to flow into the U.S. Raimondo also indicated during a congressional hearing on the 23rd that investments in the U.S. semiconductor industry during Trump's term are expected to reach $1 trillion. (Dongxin News Agency)

  • MetaPlanet Issues Zero-Coupon Bonds Worth 8 Billion Yen to Increase Bitcoin Holdings

    On April 24, according to market news: Japan's Bitcoin treasury company MetaPlanet issued zero-coupon ordinary bonds worth 8 billion yen (approximately 53 million USD), with 100% of the raised funds allocated to increasing Bitcoin holdings, continuing the 'Japanese version of MicroStrategy' aggressive coin acquisition strategy.

  • Trump to Speak at Cryptocurrency Conference in Florida on Saturday

    April 24, White House, USA: Trump will speak at a cryptocurrency conference in Florida on Saturday. (Jin Shi)

  • Deepseek Official Website Releases deepseek-v4 API Documentation

    On April 24, Deepseek's official website launched the deepseek-v4 API and model introduction, including deepseek-v4-flash and deepseek-v4-pro. (Jinshi)

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees Net Inflow of $223.16 Million Yesterday

    On April 24, according to monitoring by Trader T, the US spot Bitcoin ETF experienced a net inflow of $223.16 million yesterday.

  • Trump States He Will Not Use Nuclear Weapons Against Iran

    On April 24, according to CCTV International News, during an event at the White House on the afternoon of April 23, U.S. President Trump told the media that he could reach an agreement with Iran right now, but he wants the agreement to be 'permanent,' ensuring that Iran never has the chance to possess nuclear weapons. Therefore, he does not want to rush. Trump stated, 'There is plenty of time,' 'there is absolutely no pressure,' and 'the real pressure is on Iran,' which is unable to restore oil transportation under U.S. maritime blockade. He added that if Iran does not want to reach an agreement, he would 'complete the remaining tasks through military means.' When asked if he would consider using nuclear weapons against Iran, Trump replied, 'No,' and stated that even without launching a nuclear strike, the U.S. has already 'completely destroyed' Iran. When pressed by reporters on why the conflict was not resolved within the initially stated 4 to 6 weeks, Trump repeatedly mentioned that the U.S. fought in the Vietnam War for 18 years, and claimed that the U.S. had actually 'militarily taken down Iran' within 6 weeks; now it is just a matter of 'both sides taking a break.' (Dongxin News Agency)

  • BTC Rises Above $78,000

    Market data shows that BTC has risen above $78,000, currently priced at $78,118, with a 24-hour decline narrowing to 0.82%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.

  • BTC Falls Below $77,000

    Market data shows that BTC has fallen below $77,000, currently priced at $76,983.55, with a 24-hour decline of 2.36%. The market is experiencing significant volatility, so please ensure proper risk management.