Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

Address Poisoning Scam: What You Need to Know and How to Protect Yourself

This scam is not specific to Safe or Safe{Wallet} but is generally possible in all types of wallets. Also, there is no need to be worried about assets at risk in this type of situation as long as no other transaction is initiated to the fraudulent address.

At Safe, we work continuously to keep abreast of the latest security issues our users face and release features and resources to help users out whenever possible. Today we will be tackling address poisoning and what users can do to keep Safe!

Imagine walking down a familiar street and spotting your friend waving from afar. You stride towards them, only to realize it’s a stranger wearing similar clothes. This moment of mistaken identity is akin to address poisoning in the crypto world. Scammers craft wallet addresses that mirror legitimate ones, much like a doppelgänger in a crowd. Just as you might inadvertently approach the wrong person, users unknowingly send assets to these deceptive addresses, falling prey to a sophisticated digital masquerade. This is the address poisoning scam, a subtle yet devastating form of fraud. This post aims to dissect the anatomy of these scams, illustrating how they manifest and offering strategies to fortify against them.

What is Address Poisoning?

Address poisoning is a type of scam trying to trick users into sending assets to a fraudulent address. The attacker specifically designs the fraudulent address to look very similar to the correct one. This is done by generating a “vanity address” with a number of characters matching. In case victims carelessly copy the address without further verification, they may accidentally send their assets to the fraudulent address instead.

HOW COULD SUCH FRAUDULENT ADDRESSES EVEN SHOW UP INSIDE WALLET INTERFACES IN THE FIRST PLACE?

In order to display a full transaction history such as token transfers into and outside an account, wallets typically rely on backend services. These services listen to ERC20 events emitted on chain in order to learn about these transfers. Any contract can trigger these events with any content, no matter if legit or fraudulent. Besides, wallets typically display only the first and last four characters of an address on the transaction history, thereby increasing chances of an attacker since they would have to only create a “vanity address” which shares common first and last 4 characters with the legit address.

In the above screenshot, only the lower transaction has been done with a legitimate token and authorised by the owner of the Safe. The upper one is a fake transfer as part of the scam attempt.

What should users do to protect themselves?

There are a number of preventative actions users should take whenever transferring assets and generally executing transactions.

Verify, Verify, Verify

Any address should always be thoroughly checked in its entire length. Never copy addresses blindly from transaction history in order to transfer assets but rather from a trusted source. Safe{Wallet} displays checksummed addresses throughout the application. Always double check the correct use of uppercase and lowercase letters as well.

Use human-readable labels wherever possible

Account addresses are cryptic. It is hard and time consuming for a human to reliably verify all characters of an address. Besides the checksums mentioned above, users should use human readable ENS names as well as the Safe{Wallet} address book feature as much as possible.

Small tests save big losses

Before transferring high value assets, always do a test transfer with a small amount. Once the recipient confirms the successful transfer, authorise the transactions transferring the full amount.

Take security warnings seriously

Safe{Wallet} partnered with Redefine to scan each transaction for potential risks before execution. All affected Safes have received a risk warning of category “medium” before execution, referring to suspicious recipient addresses as the cause. Yet users still decided to proceed. The DeFirewall feature enhances transaction security by scanning every onchain transaction prior to signing. Its automated engine identifies risks associated with the transaction and provides a risk profile for each identified issue, clearly showing if a transaction would likely result in the user losing funds.

How is Safe{Wallet} improving security?

Ultimately, it is the user’s responsibility to carefully examine each transaction before execution. For enhanced security, Safe has also implemented the following several measures.

Labeling of Risky Addresses and Tokens

We have systematically marked addresses and tokens involved in the recent scams. This ongoing process is a part of our commitment to actively identify and label potential threats. While we strive for comprehensiveness, there may be instances of delay in identifying and labeling new threats. Users should be aware that not all potential risks may be immediately flagged and continue to exercise caution

Modifying Transaction Visibility

To help mitigate risks we released a hotfix hiding suspicious token transfers completely. As a proper fix, outgoing transfers unrelated to a direct transaction involving an unknown token will be marked better in the user interface. This measure is designed to help prevent scams while ensuring that genuine transactions, like those involving decentralized exchanges remain operational, albeit less visible in the transaction history. While we strive for comprehensiveness, there may be instances of delay in identifying and labeling new threats. Users should be aware that not all potential risks may be immediately flagged and continue to exercise caution.

The scam transfer is marked as such in the transaction history.

The Safe{Wallet} asset overview already leverages Safe’s default tokenlist. The transaction history now implements the same approach.

On assets overview, users can choose between seeing only default/trusted tokens or all tokens. The latter would contain any spam and scam token.

Enhanced Detection by Redefine

Redefine has upgraded its detection algorithms, significantly enhancing the accuracy in pinpointing address poisoning attacks targeting Safe users. Users will now receive 'High' severity alerts, accompanied by detailed insights and explanations, explicitly mentioning 'address poisoning' to ensure clarity and immediate awareness of the specific risk involved.

Conclusion

Crypto, just like in everyday life, is filled with both familiar and deceptive faces. By understanding the mechanics of address poisoning scams and adopting proactive measures, users everywhere can better navigate this landscape, ensuring a safer transaction environment for all.

Finally, knowledge is your best defense. For a deep dive into security best practices on avoiding address poisoning scams, check out our comprehensive guide.

Stay alert, stay safe.

Disclaimer:

Please note that the measures and implementations described in this article are provided for informational purposes only and do not imply any changes to the license terms and/or any applicable terms of use of Safe Wallet. Users should always refer to the official terms of service for the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding the use of our services.

Token lists are compiled using data from external third-party sources. We do not vouch for the accuracy of this data, and do not make any claims regarding its relevance or timeliness. Often, data may not be available for certain tokens, especially those that are new or less known.

The token lists are not to be taken as investment advice. They are not exhaustive in highlighting all possible risks. We advise conducting your own research on tokens before engaging in any buying or selling activities. The information provided is solely for informational purposes…

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • U.S. July Nonfarm Payrolls Fall by 23,000, Missing Market Expectations

    On August 7, U.S. nonfarm payrolls decreased by 23,000 in July, compared with market expectations of an increase of 80,000, and the previous value was an increase of 57,000.

  • US May and June Nonfarm Payroll Additions Revised Down by 103,000 Combined

    On August 7, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: May nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 129,000 to 63,000; June nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 57,000 to 20,000. After the revisions, the combined additions for May and June were 103,000 lower than previously reported.

  • U.S. Rate Futures Market Sees Lower Odds of Fed September Hike

    On August 7, the probability of a Fed rate hike in September as priced by U.S. interest rate futures declined.

  • New York Gold Futures Top $4,400 per Ounce

    New York gold futures topped $4,400 per ounce, up 2.36% on the day.

  • Japan Finance Minister: FX Market Affected by Moves Not Driven by Actual Demand

    Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said she and U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent agreed that the foreign exchange market has been affected by moves not driven by actual demand.

  • BTC Breaks Through $65,000

    Market data shows BTC has broken through $65,000, currently reported at $65,007.44, with a 24-hour increase of 0.6%. The market is highly volatile, please exercise risk control.

  • Brent Crude Drops 2.00% Intraday to $81.07/Barrel

    Brent crude oil fell 2.00% during the day, now at $81.07 per barrel. (Jin Shi)

  • Trump: Data Centers May Be More Important Than Oil

    August 7 news, U.S. President Trump said in an interview with Punchbowl News, "I saw the other day that Texas seems to be opposed to building data centers. I think that's a mistake. I'm not taking a position—I just think it's a mistake, because there are other communities that want to build data centers. When a community is willing to accept data centers, it means a lot of money will flow into that community. I don't think they're ugly. Some of the data centers I've seen are the most incredible buildings I've ever seen. They are very important to the economy. If Texas says no to data centers, that's a mistake, because data centers may be more important than oil."

  • Trump to Meet with Mining Executives

    On August 7, according to CCTV International News, US President Trump will convene executives from some of the world's largest mining companies at the US State Department on August 7 local time, in an effort to take action to 'secure critical mineral supplies for the US and its allies.' Reuters reported that the US urgently needs critical minerals to replenish weapons inventories depleted during the war against Iran. During the more than five-month war with Iran, the US military expended large quantities of precision-guided missiles and air defense interceptors. US defense officials and lawmakers have warned that given existing production capacity constraints, replenishing some stockpiles could take years—although the Trump administration has denied reports of a so-called 'severe shortage of ammunition stockpiles.' According to Pentagon officials and defense companies, supplies of minerals such as rare earths, tungsten, germanium, and scandium are essential for manufacturing precision-guided missiles, fighter jets, armored vehicles, infrared sensors, and other advanced weapons systems. Expected attendees include industry giants such as global mining giant Rio Tinto Group, Australia's BHP, US Freeport-McMoRan, US Mountain Pass Materials, US Rare Earths, US Energy Fuels, and Canada's Metals Company. According to sources, the Trump administration plans to announce multiple deals and memorandums of understanding.

  • US Regulators Systematically Review Chinese AI Firms' Third-Country Computing Power Leasing

    August 7 news, according to Bloomberg, people familiar with the matter revealed that the U.S. government department responsible for investigating chip export control violations is reviewing Chinese AI companies' leasing of computing power in third countries to obtain Nvidia advanced chips.