Cointime

Download App
iOS & Android

3 Overrated Crypto Concepts That Cost Me Thousands of Dollars

Validated Individual Expert

Like eating, investing is a very personal and variable undertaking. For example, some people skip breakfast, while others consider it the day's most important meal. When it comes to investing, some people happily invest in index funds and ETFs, while others trade cryptos, invest in options, or trade on margin.

And some of our investing habits, like our eating habits, can be very unhealthy and lead to a lower quality of life. Nobody wants to be 200 pounds overweight or 50 pounds underweight, and most people don't want to be broke or devote every waking minute to thinking about money.

And, like dieting, several investing concepts get peddled to us, promising us quick riches, stellar returns, and a more luxurious lower-stress lifestyle. Some work, but a lot of them don't. And I thought this might be a good time to reflect on some of the crypto investing concepts that have cost me a lot of money and provided me with some expensive lessons.

Overrated Concept #1

Locking crypto and expecting consistent returns

Many crypto projects and platforms want you to lock your assets away for extended durations. Conceptually, this should work as it reduces sell pressure when the tokens and assets are locked. However, locking your assets for long periods is usually a risk not worth taking.

Whether it's for increased staking returns, higher yields, or more voting rights, locking your assets in a long-term lock situation puts you in a precarious situation. It strips you of your ability to control your assets and provides the platform with too much authority over your investment.

Here are a few examples where locking my assets long-term has cost me huge sums of money. In July of last year, I discussed my investment in Multichain in the article, Crypto of the Week: Discover This Profitable Crypto Trading at a Discount! I purchased MULTI tokens in the $4-$5 range.

In July, I made a big mistake by locking my MULTI tokens for four years. Initially, my staking rewards were high at around a 60% APY paid in USDC. However, six months later, my rewards are barely 4% APY. Meanwhile, the MULTI token is trading at nearly $9. Had I not staked my assets for four years, I could sell some or all of my tokens at a nice profit. Instead, I am collecting next to nothing from the variable staking rewards.

More recently, I made the mistake of providing liquidity on a DeFi platform, Furio. I was offered a 10% bonus if I locked my liquidity for 90 days. Foolishly, I agreed to this option. Then, the developers adjusted the contract, where my liquidity kept re-locking for 90 days, meaning I couldn't truly withdraw it.

Even Ethereum stakers probably experienced regret when they missed their opportunity to sell ETH at nearly $5000. However, they still have to wait a few months for the Shanghai update to be able to sell, and ETH is trading at much lower prices while their crypto was locked in the staking contract.

Long-term locks assume too much risk and often don't provide rewards commensurate with the risks you have to take. Therefore, I will not lock my assets for extended durations when I can avoid doing so.

Overrated Concept #2

Paying too much attention to crypto influencers

All of the crypto influencers I listen to on YouTube have, for the most part, been completely wrong. But, of course, they will always point out how they were correct and have been one step ahead. But, if they did admit mistakes, people wouldn't be listening to them.

Crypto is such a new space that because someone has survived in the space for five years doesn't make them an expert. I still listen to the influencers to get their perspectives because they have teams that gather good data. I also like getting the narrative peddled to retail.

But we have learned that these influencers have often been paid to promote projects or act in ways that aren't in the best interest of their community. Additionally, most of these influencers aren't crazy smart and happen to be at the right place at the right time with the right clickbait.

I'm not saying all influencers are bad or selling out their communities. But, whenever taking someone's "not financial advice," you always want to think, "if this person is so great, why aren't they just using their strategy to make themselves rich? Why are they trying to convince me to buy this, pay for this service, or use this platform?"

Don't get me wrong. I am a part of this crowd. While I don't consider myself an influencer, I write about projects I am biased about and want to succeed. Unfortunately, many times I am wrong. However, I do my best to write about things I am invested in and explain my reasoning for investing in them.

Overrated Concept #3

Being overexposed to the 10–100X altcoins

A big lesson I took away from my first bull market in crypto was not having any Bitcoin and Ethereum. Instead, I invested primarily in altcoins that boomed during the bull and crashed during the bear. I learned from this mistake, and during my second bull run, I continually accumulated Bitcoin and Ethereum. This has kept me solvent during this bear market.

I invested in many altcoin projects that mooned during the bull market. Unfortunately, I diversified into more high-risk projects or held the coins and now see them sitting at 99% below their all-time highs. Many of these I sold off at the end of last year for tax purposes. In the 2017–2018 bull market, most of the unknown altcoins I held never bounced back in the most recent bull market.

When I should have locked my altcoin gains into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins, I invested in higher-risk altcoins and NFT projects. Unfortunately, many of these investments are probably dead or will take a long time to recover.

Two humbling projects I invested in at the peak were OMI and Elephant Money. Unfortunately, I got overexcited about these projects and lost thousands of dollars in a hyped-up narrative I created. Had I kept my gains in stablecoins, Bitcoin, or Ethereum, I'd be in a much stronger, more confident position today.

Key Takeaways

These are overrated concepts. You may completely disagree. And that is fine. Like our eating habits, our investing habits will differ. Perhaps, you invested in Solana at $0.50 and are still way up, even if it's down over 90% from all-time highs. Or, maybe you are earning consistent yields from the long-term locking of your assets. Or maybe, you found an influencer who provides you with alpha that has made you tremendous returns.

But, just as I learned in my first cycle that Bitcoin and Ethereum should be the cornerstone of my crypto portfolio, I have also learned from these overrated concepts in the most recent bull market.

So, what are your thoughts? Do you have any overrated concepts you will avoid on your investing journey? Do you disagree with me and think some of these concepts are underrated? Let me and other readers know in the responses.

Comments

All Comments

Recommended for you

  • Saudi Arabia Depletes 86% of Patriot Missile Stockpile

    According to British media reports, within the first 38 days after the outbreak of the war, Saudi Arabia launched approximately 2,400 PAC-3 (Patriot-3) interceptor missiles, accounting for about 86% of the country's total stockpile of 2,800 missiles. By April of last year, Saudi Arabia had only about 400 interceptor missiles remaining. Other Gulf Arab states also consumed missile reserves on a similar scale, highlighting the military crisis facing the region. (Jin Shi)

  • Experts: The Strait of Hormuz 'Will Never' Return to Pre-War Status

    Ali Akbar Dareini, a researcher at the Iranian Strategic Studies Center, stated that Iran and Oman are about to reach an agreement on the future management of the Strait of Hormuz, with the main obstacle being U.S. pressure on Oman to adopt a position more aligned with Washington. Dareini emphasized that Iran considers future control of the strait crucial for its national security. In recent months, the U.S. has conducted strikes against Iran, which Iran claims were launched from bases in the region. Dareini noted that the ongoing negotiations between Iran and Oman present the U.S. with a 'good opportunity to extricate itself from this quagmire' by recognizing Iran and Oman as the countries that will determine the 'future' of the Strait of Hormuz. 'However, the Strait of Hormuz will never return to its pre-war status,' he continued. 'The geopolitical landscape of the region has changed.'

  • Iran: Negotiations with Oman Unrelated to Reopening of Strait of Hormuz

    On August 8, a spokesperson for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran stated that the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is unrelated to negotiations between Iran and Oman, but rather depends on whether the United States fully accepts Iran's conditions and ceases interference in regional negotiations. "Once the United States accepts Iran's conditions, the Strait will undoubtedly reopen." (CCTV News)

  • Whale Shorting $102 Million in Bitcoin Faces Partial Liquidation, Remaining Liquidation Price Around $65,300

    On August 8, TheDataNerd reported that a whale using 40x leverage to short $102 million in Bitcoin recently faced partial liquidation, incurring a loss of $1.46 million over the past week. Currently, the margin call has reduced the short position to approximately $60 million, with an opening price of $64,212.5 and a liquidation price of $65,310.2.

  • BTC Falls Below $65,000

    Market data shows BTC has fallen below $65,000, currently reported at $64,999.23, with a 24-hour increase of 1.01%. Market volatility is high, please exercise risk control.

  • Hedge Fund AISituational Awareness's Mysterious $400 Million Investment Targets Chip Startup Source Foundry

    On August 8, sources revealed that the hedge fund Situational Awareness, managed by former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, made a mysterious $400 million investment in the chip manufacturing startup Source Foundry just days after facing imminent collapse. Previously, Bloomberg reported that the hedge fund invested in a private company backed by Sequoia Capital, but did not disclose the name of the specific company. The Wall Street Journal had earlier reported that the recipient of the investment was Source Foundry, unveiling the target of this mysterious funding deployment by Situational Awareness.

  • US Spot Bitcoin ETF Sees $101.79M Net Inflow Yesterday

    On August 8, according to Trader T's monitoring, US spot bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $101.79 million yesterday.

  • US Official: Ukraine Agrees to Avoid Strikes on Non-Russian Tankers and Black Sea Oil Facilities

    On August 8, according to a US official, Ukraine has agreed not to target certain non-Russian tankers and Black Sea infrastructure vital to Kazakhstan's crude oil exports. This follows ship attacks last month that caused loading disruptions. The US official said Ukraine has set up contact points so commercial shipping companies can communicate information and ensure safe passage. The commitment was reached after meetings between senior US government leaders and Ukrainian leadership, marking a potentially significant step toward increasing regional oil shipments. Previously, activity in the region had cooled significantly due to several recent attacks near the Caspian Pipeline Consortium terminal in Russia's Novorossiysk. (Jin Shi)

  • U.S. July Nonfarm Payrolls Fall by 23,000, Missing Market Expectations

    On August 7, U.S. nonfarm payrolls decreased by 23,000 in July, compared with market expectations of an increase of 80,000, and the previous value was an increase of 57,000.

  • US May and June Nonfarm Payroll Additions Revised Down by 103,000 Combined

    On August 7, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: May nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 129,000 to 63,000; June nonfarm payroll additions were revised down from 57,000 to 20,000. After the revisions, the combined additions for May and June were 103,000 lower than previously reported.